CJS - Criminal Justice System - Publications: Coerced Treatment

Coerced Treatment

To order a hard copy of any of the publications listed below, send the order number (i.e. 12.1) and your postal address to KLangabeer@mednet.ucla.edu.

Your first 5 articles ordered per year are free, but additional articles are $1 per reprint. Checks should be made out to "UC Regents." Purchase orders will not be accepted for orders under $25. The mailing address for all reprint correspondence is:
Kris Langabeer
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs
1640 S. Sepulveda Blvd., Ste. 200
Los Angeles, CA 90025

We apologize for the inconvenience of the present ordering system. We are working to improve it.

Anglin, M. D. (1988). A social policy analysis of compulsory treatment for opiate dependence: Introduction. Journal of Drug Issues, 13(4), 503-504. (18.5)

Anglin, M. D. (1989). Compulsory treatment for opiate dependence: Reviews of findings and social policy implications. (18.6)

Anglin, M. D., Brecht, M. L., & Maddahian, E. (1989). Pretreatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology, 27(3), 537-557. (18.10)

Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1990). Legal coercion and drug abuse treatment: Research findings and social policy implications. In J. Inciardi (Ed.), Handbook of drug control in the United States (pp. 151-176). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. (18.12)

Anglin, M. D., & Hser, Y. (1991). Criminal justice and the drug-abusing offender: Policy issues of coerced treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9(3), 243-267. (06.14)

Anglin, M. D., & Maugh, T. H. (1992). Overturning myths about coerced drug treatment. California Psychologist, 19-22. (18.22)

Deschenes, E. P., & Anglin, M. D. (1992). Effects of legal supervision on narcotic addict behavior, ethnic and gender influences. In T. Mieczkowski (Ed.), Drugs, crime, and social policy (pp. 167-196). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. (06.19)

Brecht, M. L., Anglin, M. D., & Wang, J. C. (1993). Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19(1), 89-106. (18.24)Falkin, G. P., Prendergast, M. L., & Anglin, M. D. (1994). Drug treatment in the criminal justice system. Federal Probation, 58(3), 31-36. (06.12)

Maugh, T. H., & Anglin, M. D. (1994). Court-ordered drug treatment does work: But some approaches are more successful than others. Judges' Journal, 34(4), 10-13; 38-40. (18.23)

Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, M. D. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62(1), 3-10. (06.35)

Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., Cartier, J., Wexler, H., Knight, K., & Anglin, M. D. (1999). Barriers to implementing effective correctional drug treatment programs. Prison Journal, 79(2), 150-162. (06.37)

Farabee, D., Shen, H., Prendergast, M., & Cartier, J. (2004). The effectiveness of coerced admission to prison-based drug treatment. In K. Knight & D. Farabee (Eds.), Treating Addicted Offenders: A Continuum of Effective Practices (pp. 1-12). Kingston: Civic Research Institute.

Farabee, D. (2006). Naltrexone as negative reinforcement: Comments on "A behavioral analysis of coercion in substance abuse treatment." Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31(2), 141-142.